AG -v- Da Silva [2007] JRC 220 (26 November 2007)
Given the quantity of heroin supplied, the regularity of supply, and the sentencing guidelines, the appropriate starting point is 11 years' imprisonment. Due to early guilty plea, full admissions, lack of previous convictions, and other mitigating factors, the sentence is reduced to 5 years' imprisonment. Deportation is recommended after balancing Article 8 ECHR rights against public interest in preventing drug trafficking.
- Citation
- [2007] JRC 220
- Parties
- Defendant: Da Silva; Prosecutor: Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 26 November 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing Judgment
- Outcome
- convicted and sentenced
- Legal Topics
- Drug Trafficking, Sentencing, Deportation, Admissions in Police Interview, Article 8 ECHR
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Da Silva
Defendant
Attorney General
Prosecutor
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentence for supply of heroin
- 2 Whether admissions in police interview should be excluded for sentencing
- 3 Whether to recommend deportation under Immigration Act 1971 considering Article 8 ECHR
Ratio Decidendi
Given the quantity of heroin supplied, the regularity of supply, and the sentencing guidelines, the appropriate starting point is 11 years' imprisonment. Due to early guilty plea, full admissions, lack of previous convictions, and other mitigating factors, the sentence is reduced to 5 years' imprisonment. Deportation is recommended after balancing Article 8 ECHR rights against public interest in preventing drug trafficking.
Court Disposition
convicted and sentenced
Orders
- 5 years' imprisonment
- recommendation for deportation upon completion of sentence
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment