AG v Edmead Ors [2005] JRC 028 (11 March 2005)

AG v Edmead Ors [2005] JRC 028 (11 March 2005)

Strong mitigation and personal circumstances justified non-custodial sentences for Darren, Paul, and Amanda Edmead, while Mark Turner's prior record necessitated a custodial sentence, albeit reduced to encourage rehabilitation.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2005] JRC 028
Parties
Defendant: Darren Edmead; Defendant: Paul Edmead; Defendant: Amanda Edmead; Defendant: Mark Turner; Prosecutor: Crown
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
11 March 2005
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Outcome
Partly custodial, partly non-custodial sentences imposed.
Legal Topics
Burglary, Receiving Stolen Property, Sentencing, Probation, Community Service
Criminal Law Burglary Receiving Stolen Property Sentencing Probation Community Service

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Darren Edmead

Defendant

Paul Edmead

Defendant

Amanda Edmead

Defendant

Mark Turner

Defendant

Crown

Prosecutor

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing

  1. 1 Appropriate sentencing for burglary and related offences
  2. 2 Mitigation in sentencing for defendants with personal difficulties
  3. 3 Application of custodial and non-custodial sentences

Ratio Decidendi

Strong mitigation and personal circumstances justified non-custodial sentences for Darren, Paul, and Amanda Edmead, while Mark Turner's prior record necessitated a custodial sentence, albeit reduced to encourage rehabilitation.

Court Disposition

Partly custodial, partly non-custodial sentences imposed.

Orders

  • Darren Edmead: 12 months probation and 180 hours community service.
  • Paul Edmead: 12 months probation, concurrent on charges.