Lumb v AG 22-Jan-2021 [2021] JCA 010 (22 January 2021)

Lumb v AG 22-Jan-2021 [2021] JCA 010 (22 January 2021)

The application for extension of time and leave to appeal was refused because the sentence imposed was within the established guidelines, there was no error in principle or manifest excess, no conflict of interest or procedural unfairness was established, and the applicant's legal representation was not deficient so...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] JCA 010
Parties
Applicant: David Lumb; Respondent: The Attorney General
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
22 January 2021
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
Application for extension of time and leave to appeal refused.
Legal Topics
Drug Offences, Sentencing, Appeals, Extension of Time
Criminal Law Drug Offences Sentencing Appeals Extension of Time

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 7 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

David Lumb

Applicant

The Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Against Sentence

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed was wrong in principle or manifestly excessive
  2. 2 Whether there was a conflict of interest or procedural unfairness in sentencing
  3. 3 Whether the applicant's legal representation was deficient so as to cause a miscarriage of justice

Ratio Decidendi

The application for extension of time and leave to appeal was refused because the sentence imposed was within the established guidelines, there was no error in principle or manifest excess, no conflict of interest or procedural unfairness was established, and the applicant's legal representation was not deficient so as to cause a miscarriage of justice.

Court Disposition

Application for extension of time and leave to appeal refused.