Lumb v AG 22-Jan-2021 [2021] JCA 010 (22 January 2021)
The application for extension of time and leave to appeal was refused because the sentence imposed was within the established guidelines, there was no error in principle or manifest excess, no conflict of interest or procedural unfairness was established, and the applicant's legal representation was not deficient so...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] JCA 010
- Parties
- Applicant: David Lumb; Respondent: The Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 22 January 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Application for extension of time and leave to appeal refused.
- Legal Topics
- Drug Offences, Sentencing, Appeals, Extension of Time
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Lumb
Applicant
The Attorney General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed was wrong in principle or manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether there was a conflict of interest or procedural unfairness in sentencing
- 3 Whether the applicant's legal representation was deficient so as to cause a miscarriage of justice
Ratio Decidendi
The application for extension of time and leave to appeal was refused because the sentence imposed was within the established guidelines, there was no error in principle or manifest excess, no conflict of interest or procedural unfairness was established, and the applicant's legal representation was not deficient so as to cause a miscarriage of justice.
Court Disposition
Application for extension of time and leave to appeal refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment