Davis v Att. Gen. [2005] JLR_Note 22 (08 June 2005)
The court considered the appropriate sentence for assault in accordance with sentencing guidelines.
- Parties
- Applicant: Davis; Respondent: Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 08 June 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Legal Topics
- Assault, Sentencing Guidelines
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 1
Parties
Davis
Applicant
Attorney General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 appropriate sentence for assault
Ratio Decidendi
The court considered the appropriate sentence for assault in accordance with sentencing guidelines.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment