De La Haye v Att. Gen. [1996] JLR 163 (24 April 1996)
Evidence from an identification parade, even if improperly conducted, is not automatically excluded; its admission is at the discretion of the trial judge.
- Citation
- [1996] JLR 163
- Parties
- Applicant: De La Haye; Respondent: Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 24 April 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- evidence admitted
- Legal Topics
- Identification Parade, Admissibility of Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
De La Haye
Applicant
Attorney General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether evidence from an improperly conducted identification parade should be admitted
Ratio Decidendi
Evidence from an identification parade, even if improperly conducted, is not automatically excluded; its admission is at the discretion of the trial judge.
Court Disposition
evidence admitted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment