AG -v- De Ste George and Ors 10-Mar-2006 [2006] JRC 034 (10 March 2006)
De St George's involvement in drug supply, despite being for personal addiction and not profit, warranted a custodial sentence due to the seriousness of drug trafficking. Snowden's lack of prior convictions and demonstrated rehabilitation justified probation and community service instead of imprisonment.
- Citation
- [2006] JRC 034
- Parties
- Defendant: De St George; Defendant: Snowden
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 10 March 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- De St George sentenced to 2 years' imprisonment (concurrent sentences); Snowden placed on 1 year probation with conditions and ordered to complete 90 hours' community service, with alternative of 3 months' youth detention.
- Legal Topics
- Drug Offences, Sentencing, Probation, Community Service
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
De St George
Defendant
Snowden
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 appropriate sentencing for drug-related offences
- 2 consideration of mitigating factors in sentencing
- 3 conditions for probation and community service
Ratio Decidendi
De St George's involvement in drug supply, despite being for personal addiction and not profit, warranted a custodial sentence due to the seriousness of drug trafficking. Snowden's lack of prior convictions and demonstrated rehabilitation justified probation and community service instead of imprisonment.
Court Disposition
De St George sentenced to 2 years' imprisonment (concurrent sentences); Snowden placed on 1 year probation with conditions and ordered to complete 90 hours' community service, with alternative of 3 months' youth detention.
Orders
- De St George: 2 years' imprisonment (concurrent on all counts)
- Forfeiture and destruction of drugs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment