Deeny v Health & Social Servs. [2003] JLR 138 (07 April 2003)

Deeny v Health & Social Servs. [2003] JLR 138 (07 April 2003)

The court held that relevant documents may be disclosed under the 1999 Law to a person likely to be a party unless disclosure would be injurious to the public interest. Confidentiality alone does not suffice to prevent disclosure, but the public interest in preserving confidentiality must be balanced against the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2003] JLR 138
Parties
Applicant: Deeny; Respondent: Health & Social Services
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
07 April 2003
Procedural Posture
Civil / Discovery Application
Outcome
Application for discovery allowed subject to balancing public interest and confidentiality.
Legal Topics
Discovery, Pre Action Disclosure, Confidentiality, Public Interest
Civil Procedure Discovery Pre Action Disclosure Confidentiality Public Interest

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Deeny

Applicant

Health & Social Services

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil / Discovery Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether relevant documents may be disclosed under the Law Reform (Disclosure and Conduct before Action) (Jersey) Law 1999, art. 2 to a person likely to be a party
  2. 2 Whether confidentiality alone is sufficient to prevent disclosure
  3. 3 How to balance public interest in confidentiality against the need to ensure justice

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that relevant documents may be disclosed under the 1999 Law to a person likely to be a party unless disclosure would be injurious to the public interest. Confidentiality alone does not suffice to prevent disclosure, but the public interest in preserving confidentiality must be balanced against the need to ensure justice, such as enabling a potential claimant to decide whether to bring an action. The court may inspect documents to ensure the correct balance is struck.

Court Disposition

Application for discovery allowed subject to balancing public interest and confidentiality.

Orders

  • Relevant documents to be disclosed unless disclosure would be injurious to the public interest.
  • Court may inspect documents to determine appropriate disclosure.