AG v Baksa [2021] JRC 328 (24 December 2021)
The police's negligent failure to disclose relevant material caused the trial to be vacated, but as the defendant was on legal aid and the advocate did not seek a wasted costs order, no such order was made. The court would have exercised its discretion to award costs if costs had been incurred outside the legal aid scheme.
- Citation
- [2021] JRC 328
- Parties
- Prosecution: States of Jersey Police; Defendant: Defendant
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 24 December 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Pre Trial (application for Wasted Costs Order)
- Outcome
- No wasted costs order made
- Legal Topics
- Wasted Costs Orders, Disclosure Failures, Negligence by Prosecution, Legal Aid
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
States of Jersey Police
Prosecution
Defendant
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Pre Trial (application for Wasted Costs Order)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a wasted costs order should be made against the prosecution for negligent non-disclosure of evidence
- 2 Whether costs have been incurred by the defence as a result of the prosecution's negligence
- 3 Appropriateness of a wasted costs order where the defendant is on legal aid
Ratio Decidendi
The police's negligent failure to disclose relevant material caused the trial to be vacated, but as the defendant was on legal aid and the advocate did not seek a wasted costs order, no such order was made. The court would have exercised its discretion to award costs if costs had been incurred outside the legal aid scheme.
Court Disposition
No wasted costs order made
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment