AG -v- Y [2010] JRC 110 (11 June 2010)

AG -v- Y [2010] JRC 110 (11 June 2010)

The psychologist report is admissible as a confession under Article 74, not hearsay, and there are no grounds to exclude it under Article 74(2)(b) or Article 76. The admission was voluntary, privilege/confidentiality under New Zealand law does not preclude admissibility in Jersey, and the evidence's probative value outweighs any prejudicial effect. Admission does not undermine the fairness of the trial.

Citation
[2010] JRC 110
Parties
Defendant: Defendant; Prosecution: Crown
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
11 June 2010
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Pre Trial Evidentiary Ruling
Outcome
application to exclude evidence rejected
Legal Topics
Admissibility of Confession, Hearsay, Privilege, Fair Trial, Abuse of Process
Criminal Law Evidence Law Admissibility of Confession Hearsay Privilege Fair Trial Abuse of Process

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Defendant

Defendant

Crown

Prosecution

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Pre Trial Evidentiary Ruling

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the psychologist report containing the defendant's admission is admissible as evidence
  2. 2 Whether the report constitutes hearsay or a confession under Article 74 of the Police Procedures and Criminal Evidence (Jersey) Law 2003
  3. 3 Whether the circumstances of the admission render it unreliable or unfair

Ratio Decidendi

The psychologist report is admissible as a confession under Article 74, not hearsay, and there are no grounds to exclude it under Article 74(2)(b) or Article 76. The admission was voluntary, privilege/confidentiality under New Zealand law does not preclude admissibility in Jersey, and the evidence's probative value outweighs any prejudicial effect. Admission does not undermine the fairness of the trial.

Court Disposition

application to exclude evidence rejected

Orders

  • psychologist report admitted as evidence