AG v Trant Construction [2003] JRC 114 (04 July 2003)

AG v Trant Construction [2003] JRC 114 (04 July 2003)

The company failed to secure the site and adequately inform employees, resulting in a risk of asbestos exposure; strong mitigation reduced the penalty.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2003] JRC 114
Parties
Defendant: Defendant company; Prosecutor: Crown; Senior Resources Director: Mr Trant
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
04 July 2003
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Outcome
conviction with fine
Legal Topics
Asbestos Exposure, Workplace Safety, Mitigation, Sentencing
Health and Safety Criminal Law Asbestos Exposure Workplace Safety Mitigation Sentencing

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Defendant company

Defendant

Crown

Prosecutor

Mr Trant

Senior Resources Director

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing

  1. 1 Breach of health and safety regulations relating to asbestos
  2. 2 Failure to secure site against danger to third parties
  3. 3 Insufficient communication to employees regarding asbestos risks

Ratio Decidendi

The company failed to secure the site and adequately inform employees, resulting in a risk of asbestos exposure; strong mitigation reduced the penalty.

Court Disposition

conviction with fine

Orders

  • Fine of £7,500 on each charge
  • Costs of £2,500