AG v Trant Construction [2003] JRC 114 (04 July 2003)
The company failed to secure the site and adequately inform employees, resulting in a risk of asbestos exposure; strong mitigation reduced the penalty.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2003] JRC 114
- Parties
- Defendant: Defendant company; Prosecutor: Crown; Senior Resources Director: Mr Trant
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 04 July 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- conviction with fine
- Legal Topics
- Asbestos Exposure, Workplace Safety, Mitigation, Sentencing
Health and Safety Criminal Law Asbestos Exposure Workplace Safety Mitigation Sentencing
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Parties
Defendant company
Defendant
Crown
Prosecutor
Mr Trant
Senior Resources Director
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Breach of health and safety regulations relating to asbestos
- 2 Failure to secure site against danger to third parties
- 3 Insufficient communication to employees regarding asbestos risks
Ratio Decidendi
The company failed to secure the site and adequately inform employees, resulting in a risk of asbestos exposure; strong mitigation reduced the penalty.
Court Disposition
conviction with fine
Orders
- Fine of £7,500 on each charge
- Costs of £2,500
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment