AG -v- Cosgrove (1969) Ltd [2013] JRC 256 (20 December 2013)

AG -v- Cosgrove (1969) Ltd [2013] JRC 256 (20 December 2013)

Fine reduced to £4,000 due to defendant's financial circumstances, balancing deterrence and avoiding harm to employees' earnings.

Citation
[2013] JRC 256
Parties
Prosecutor: Crown; Defendant: Defendant Company
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
20 December 2013
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Outcome
fine imposed
Legal Topics
Risk Assessment, Workplace Safety, Sentencing, Corporate Liability

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Crown

Prosecutor

Defendant Company

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing

  1. 1 Failure to carry out risk assessment for removal of lintel
  2. 2 Unsafe system of work
  3. 3 Appropriate level of fine given financial circumstances

Ratio Decidendi

Fine reduced to £4,000 due to defendant's financial circumstances, balancing deterrence and avoiding harm to employees' earnings.

Court Disposition

fine imposed

Orders

  • Fine of £4,000 imposed with 2 years to pay
  • No order as to costs