AG -v- Self [2009] JRC 122 (09 June 2009)
There is no power under the 1961 Law or inherent jurisdiction to award costs pre-trial for withdrawn counts or interlocutory applications; such applications must be made at the end of proceedings and supported by authority.
- Citation
- [2009] JRC 122
- Parties
- Defendant: Defendant; Prosecution: Prosecution
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 09 June 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Pre Trial Interlocutory Applications
- Outcome
- Applications dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Costs in Criminal Cases, Bail Surety, Withdrawal of Indictment Counts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Defendant
Defendant
Prosecution
Prosecution
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Pre Trial Interlocutory Applications
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether bail surety can be released for legal costs prior to trial
- 2 Whether costs can be awarded pre-trial under the Costs in Criminal Cases (Jersey) Law 1961 or inherent jurisdiction
Ratio Decidendi
There is no power under the 1961 Law or inherent jurisdiction to award costs pre-trial for withdrawn counts or interlocutory applications; such applications must be made at the end of proceedings and supported by authority.
Court Disposition
Applications dismissed
Orders
- Bail surety release application dismissed
- Costs application dismissed; may be brought at end of proceedings
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment