AG v Buckley [2021] JRC 222 (25 August 2021)
Despite the seriousness of the offences and the custody threshold, the defendant's youth, early guilty plea, genuine remorse, lack of previous convictions, and low risk assessment justified a significant non-custodial sentence of community service, with concurrent orders for confiscation and forfeiture.
- Citation
- [2021] JRC 222
- Parties
- Prosecutor: The Crown; Defendant: Defendant
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 25 August 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- non-custodial sentence imposed
- Legal Topics
- Drug Importation, Possession of Controlled Substances, Sentencing of Young Offenders, Community Service Orders, Confiscation Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Crown
Prosecutor
Defendant
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Sentencing for importation of Class A drugs
- 2 Sentencing for possession of cannabis
- 3 Application of Criminal Justice (Young Offenders)(Jersey) Law 2014
Ratio Decidendi
Despite the seriousness of the offences and the custody threshold, the defendant's youth, early guilty plea, genuine remorse, lack of previous convictions, and low risk assessment justified a significant non-custodial sentence of community service, with concurrent orders for confiscation and forfeiture.
Court Disposition
non-custodial sentence imposed
Orders
- 312 hours' Community Service for importation of MDMA tablets (Count 1), equivalent to 2 years' Youth Detention
- 312 hours' Community Service for importation of LSD tablets (Count 2), equivalent to 2 years' Youth Detention, concurrent with Count 1 and Count 3
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment