AG v Jones [2019] JRC 024 (13 February 2019)
The seriousness of the defendant's conduct in drug possession with intent to supply, money laundering, and fraudulent tax returns warranted custodial sentences and a substantial fine, despite mitigation, to punish the defendant and deter others. The sentences were structured to reflect the totality of the criminality and the specific circumstances of the offences.
- Citation
- [2019] JRC 024
- Parties
- Prosecutor: The Crown; Defendant: Defendant
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 13 February 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing Judgment
- Outcome
- convicted and sentenced
- Legal Topics
- Drug Offences, Money Laundering, Income Tax Fraud, Sentencing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Crown
Prosecutor
Defendant
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentencing for possession of cannabis resin with intent to supply
- 2 Sentencing for money laundering relating to undeclared legitimate income
- 3 Sentencing for fraudulent delivery of incorrect income tax statements
Ratio Decidendi
The seriousness of the defendant's conduct in drug possession with intent to supply, money laundering, and fraudulent tax returns warranted custodial sentences and a substantial fine, despite mitigation, to punish the defendant and deter others. The sentences were structured to reflect the totality of the criminality and the specific circumstances of the offences.
Court Disposition
convicted and sentenced
Orders
- 5 months' imprisonment for possession of cannabis resin with intent to supply
- 15 months' imprisonment for each of the money laundering and income tax fraud offences, concurrent to each other and consecutive to the drug offence
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment