AG v Jones [2019] JRC 024 (13 February 2019)

AG v Jones [2019] JRC 024 (13 February 2019)

The seriousness of the defendant's conduct in drug possession with intent to supply, money laundering, and fraudulent tax returns warranted custodial sentences and a substantial fine, despite mitigation, to punish the defendant and deter others. The sentences were structured to reflect the totality of the criminality and the specific circumstances of the offences.

Citation
[2019] JRC 024
Parties
Prosecutor: The Crown; Defendant: Defendant
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
13 February 2019
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing Judgment
Outcome
convicted and sentenced
Legal Topics
Drug Offences, Money Laundering, Income Tax Fraud, Sentencing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 18 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 8
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Crown

Prosecutor

Defendant

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing Judgment

  1. 1 Appropriate sentencing for possession of cannabis resin with intent to supply
  2. 2 Sentencing for money laundering relating to undeclared legitimate income
  3. 3 Sentencing for fraudulent delivery of incorrect income tax statements

Ratio Decidendi

The seriousness of the defendant's conduct in drug possession with intent to supply, money laundering, and fraudulent tax returns warranted custodial sentences and a substantial fine, despite mitigation, to punish the defendant and deter others. The sentences were structured to reflect the totality of the criminality and the specific circumstances of the offences.

Court Disposition

convicted and sentenced

Orders

  • 5 months' imprisonment for possession of cannabis resin with intent to supply
  • 15 months' imprisonment for each of the money laundering and income tax fraud offences, concurrent to each other and consecutive to the drug offence