AG v Hope [2002] JRC 194 (11 October 2002)

AG v Hope [2002] JRC 194 (11 October 2002)

Despite mitigation, the seriousness of the assault required a custodial sentence; provocation was not accepted as a justification.

Citation
[2002] JRC 194
Parties
Defendant: [Defendant Name Not Provided]; Victim: Mr MacFirbhisigh
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
11 October 2002
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Outcome
conviction and custodial sentence
Legal Topics
Assault, Malicious Damage, Sentencing, Compensation Order
Criminal Law Assault Malicious Damage Sentencing Compensation Order

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

[Defendant Name Not Provided]

Defendant

Mr MacFirbhisigh

Victim

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendant was provoked to assault the victim
  2. 2 Appropriate sentence for assault and malicious damage
  3. 3 Consideration of mitigation in sentencing

Ratio Decidendi

Despite mitigation, the seriousness of the assault required a custodial sentence; provocation was not accepted as a justification.

Court Disposition

conviction and custodial sentence

Orders

  • Four months' imprisonment for assault
  • Two weeks' concurrent imprisonment for malicious damage