AG -v- Le Geyt [2012] JRC 178 (05 October 2012)
The court imposed consecutive sentences for certain counts to reflect the seriousness of the assaults on police officers and to emphasise their entitlement to protection, taking into account the defendant's guilty plea, age, and background.
- Citation
- [2012] JRC 178
- Parties
- Defendant: [Defendant Name Not Provided]; Prosecution: The Crown
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 05 October 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- convicted and sentenced
- Legal Topics
- Breaking and Entering, Larceny, Attempted Larceny, Resisting Police, Assault on Police, Malicious Damage, Grave and Criminal Assault, Sentencing, Consecutive and Concurrent Sentences
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
[Defendant Name Not Provided]
Defendant
The Crown
Prosecution
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate custodial sentence for multiple offences including assault on police officers
- 2 Whether sentences should be consecutive or concurrent to reflect protection of police officers
Ratio Decidendi
The court imposed consecutive sentences for certain counts to reflect the seriousness of the assaults on police officers and to emphasise their entitlement to protection, taking into account the defendant's guilty plea, age, and background.
Court Disposition
convicted and sentenced
Orders
- Total sentence of 2 years and 3 months' imprisonment imposed across two indictments, with specified counts to run consecutively and others concurrently.
- No separate penalty for breach proceedings; existing Probation Orders discharged.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment