AG -v- Phillips [2013] JRC 036A (15 February 2013)
Despite the seriousness of the offences and the usual approach of imposing a custodial sentence for being concerned in the supply of controlled drugs, the Court imposed a non-custodial sentence due to the defendant's lack of previous drug convictions, time already spent in custody, negative drug tests, and positive social and treatment reports.
- Citation
- [2013] JRC 036A
- Parties
- Defendant: [Defendant Name Not Provided]
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 15 February 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- non-custodial sentence imposed
- Legal Topics
- Drug Offences, Sentencing, Community Service, Probation, Treatment Order
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
[Defendant Name Not Provided]
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentence for being concerned in the supply of a controlled drug (cannabis)
- 2 Application of Campbell guidelines to the facts
- 3 Consideration of custodial vs non-custodial sentence
Ratio Decidendi
Despite the seriousness of the offences and the usual approach of imposing a custodial sentence for being concerned in the supply of controlled drugs, the Court imposed a non-custodial sentence due to the defendant's lack of previous drug convictions, time already spent in custody, negative drug tests, and positive social and treatment reports.
Court Disposition
non-custodial sentence imposed
Orders
- 90 hours' Community Service on Count 1 (alternative: 3 months' imprisonment)
- 40 hours' Community Service on Count 2 (alternative: 1 week's imprisonment)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment