AG v Benyoucef [2019] JRC 124 (01 July 2019)

AG v Benyoucef [2019] JRC 124 (01 July 2019)

The appropriate sentence for possession of MDMA with intent to supply, considering the defendant's overall participation, basis of plea, and mitigation, is 4 years' imprisonment, with lesser concurrent sentences for related cannabis offences and a consecutive sentence for breach of a Community Service Order, totaling 4 years and 6 months' imprisonment.

Citation
[2019] JRC 124
Parties
Defendant: [Defendant Name Not Provided]; Prosecutor: Attorney General (Crown)
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
01 July 2019
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing Judgment
Outcome
convicted and sentenced
Legal Topics
Drug Offences, Sentencing, Mitigation, Forfeiture
Criminal Law Drug Offences Sentencing Mitigation Forfeiture

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 12
Sign in to unlock

Parties

[Defendant Name Not Provided]

Defendant

Attorney General (Crown)

Prosecutor

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Appropriate sentence for possession of MDMA and cannabis with intent to supply
  2. 2 Application of sentencing guidelines for Class A drugs
  3. 3 Consideration of mitigation and consecutive/concurrent sentences

Ratio Decidendi

The appropriate sentence for possession of MDMA with intent to supply, considering the defendant's overall participation, basis of plea, and mitigation, is 4 years' imprisonment, with lesser concurrent sentences for related cannabis offences and a consecutive sentence for breach of a Community Service Order, totaling 4 years and 6 months' imprisonment.

Court Disposition

convicted and sentenced

Orders

  • 4 years' imprisonment for Count 1 (MDMA)
  • 6 months' imprisonment concurrent for Count 2 (cannabis)