AG v Le Jehan [2022] JRC 045 (18 February 2022)

AG v Le Jehan [2022] JRC 045 (18 February 2022)

Given the quantity of cannabis, the defendant's admissions, and absence of exceptional circumstances, a custodial sentence is mandatory for trafficking offences. Mitigation was considered but did not justify departure from established sentencing policy.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] JRC 045
Parties
Defendant: [Defendant Name Not Provided]; Prosecution: Attorney General (Crown)
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
18 February 2022
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Outcome
convicted and sentenced
Legal Topics
Drug Offences, Possession With Intent to Supply, Possession of Criminal Property, Confiscation Orders, Sentencing
Criminal Law Drug Offences Possession With Intent to Supply Possession of Criminal Property Confiscation Orders Sentencing

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

[Defendant Name Not Provided]

Defendant

Attorney General (Crown)

Prosecution

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing

  1. 1 Appropriate sentence for possession with intent to supply cannabis
  2. 2 Appropriate sentence for being concerned in supply of cannabis
  3. 3 Appropriate sentence for possession of criminal property

Ratio Decidendi

Given the quantity of cannabis, the defendant's admissions, and absence of exceptional circumstances, a custodial sentence is mandatory for trafficking offences. Mitigation was considered but did not justify departure from established sentencing policy.

Court Disposition

convicted and sentenced

Orders

  • Sixteen months' imprisonment on each of three counts, to run concurrently (total 16 months)
  • Confiscation order in the sum of £1,130.00