AG v Fagan [2005] JRC 031 (18 March 2005)

AG v Fagan [2005] JRC 031 (18 March 2005)

Given the defendant's limited knowledge at the outset, her good character, and strong mitigation, the offences are at the lower end of criminality and justify a non-custodial sentence despite the seriousness of money laundering.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2005] JRC 031
Parties
Defendant: [Defendant Name Not Provided]; Prosecutor: Crown Advocate
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
18 March 2005
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Outcome
convicted
Legal Topics
Money Laundering, Proceeds of Crime, Sentencing
Criminal Law Money Laundering Proceeds of Crime Sentencing

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

[Defendant Name Not Provided]

Defendant

Crown Advocate

Prosecutor

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 What is the appropriate sentence for laundering the proceeds of crime under the Proceeds of Crime (Jersey) Law 1999?
  2. 2 What mitigating and aggravating factors should be considered in sentencing for money laundering?

Ratio Decidendi

Given the defendant's limited knowledge at the outset, her good character, and strong mitigation, the offences are at the lower end of criminality and justify a non-custodial sentence despite the seriousness of money laundering.

Court Disposition

convicted

Orders

  • 180 hours of community service imposed as sentence
  • Alternative of 12 months' imprisonment if community service not performed