AG v Gallichan [2024] JRC 220 (17 October 2024)
The Court ruled that, considering the principal charge is a statutory offence of domestic abuse, the nature and gravity of the offences, and the fact that the trial date would not be affected by the mode of trial, the defendant should be tried by the Inferior Number rather than by jury.
- Citation
- [2024] JRC 220
- Parties
- Prosecution: Attorney General; Defendant: [Defendant Name Redacted]; Complainant: Complainant
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 17 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Pre Trial Mode of Trial Determination
- Outcome
- Defendant to be tried by the Inferior Number.
- Legal Topics
- Mode of Trial, Domestic Abuse, Assault, Malicious Damage, Customary Law Offences, Statutory Offences
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Attorney General
Prosecution
[Defendant Name Redacted]
Defendant
Complainant
Complainant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Pre Trial Mode of Trial Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant should be tried by jury or by the Inferior Number on a mixed indictment containing both customary law and statutory offences under Article 48 of the Criminal Procedure (Jersey) Law 2018.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court ruled that, considering the principal charge is a statutory offence of domestic abuse, the nature and gravity of the offences, and the fact that the trial date would not be affected by the mode of trial, the defendant should be tried by the Inferior Number rather than by jury.
Court Disposition
Defendant to be tried by the Inferior Number.
Orders
- Trial to be held on 11 March 2025 before the Inferior Number with a time estimate of three days.
- Plea and directions hearing to take place before the end of November.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment