In re External Confiscation Order [2016] 2 JLR 454 (22 November 2016)
Registration of the external confiscation order in Jersey is set aside under the court's inherent jurisdiction and as a matter of comity, following the foreign court's decision to set aside the order.
- Citation
- [2016] 2 JLR 454
- Parties
- Respondent: Viscount; Applicant: Defendant
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 22 November 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Application to Set Aside Registration of External Confiscation Order
- Outcome
- Registration of external confiscation order set aside; confiscated moneys (with accrued interest) ordered to be paid to defendant.
- Legal Topics
- External Confiscation Orders, Registration, Cancellation, Comity
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Viscount
Respondent
Defendant
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Application to Set Aside Registration of External Confiscation Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether registration of an external confiscation order in Jersey should be set aside if the order is set aside by a foreign court
- 2 Whether the confiscated moneys should be returned to the defendant
Ratio Decidendi
Registration of the external confiscation order in Jersey is set aside under the court's inherent jurisdiction and as a matter of comity, following the foreign court's decision to set aside the order.
Court Disposition
Registration of external confiscation order set aside; confiscated moneys (with accrued interest) ordered to be paid to defendant.
Orders
- Viscount to pay confiscated moneys with accrued interest to defendant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment