Jersey Judgment

Demore v AG [1994] JRC 096 (16 May 1994)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court held that the Attorney General's discretion to prosecute should not be interfered with unless exercised unreasonably or contrary to law.

Court disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • No order as to costs

02

Material facts

Parties

Demore

Applicant

Attorney General

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Civil / Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

whether prosecution should proceed in the public interest

Party arguments

Applicant
Applicant contended that prosecution was not in the public interest.
Respondent
Respondent argued that prosecution was justified and in the public interest.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Jersey law

    The Attorney General has discretion to prosecute where it serves the public interest.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court held that the Attorney General's discretion to prosecute should not be interfered with unless exercised unreasonably or contrary to law.

Court disposition

application dismissed

  • No order as to costs

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[1994] JRC 096

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] Jersey Unreported Judgments You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Unreported Judgments >> Demore v AG [1994] JRC 096 (16 May 1994) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/UR/1994/1994_096.html Cite as: [1994] JRC 96, [1994] JRC 096 [ New search ] [ Printable PDF version ] [ Help ] Demore v AG [1994] JRC 096 (16 May 1994) A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : [1994] JRC 096 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/UR/1994/1994_096.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.