Demore v AG [1994] JRC 096 (16 May 1994)

Demore v AG [1994] JRC 096 (16 May 1994)

The court held that the Attorney General's discretion to prosecute should not be interfered with unless exercised unreasonably or contrary to law.

Citation
[1994] JRC 096
Parties
Applicant: Demore; Respondent: Attorney General
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
16 May 1994
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Prosecution, Public Interest
Criminal Law Prosecution Public Interest

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Demore

Applicant

Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 whether prosecution should proceed in the public interest

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the Attorney General's discretion to prosecute should not be interfered with unless exercised unreasonably or contrary to law.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • No order as to costs