Jersey Judgment

Doraville Properties Corp. v. Att. Gen. [2017] 1 JLR 64 (22 February 2017)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

A US default judgment expressly finding on verified evidence that assets are proceeds of crime constitutes a finding for the purposes of the Jersey definition of 'tainted property'.

Court disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • US default judgment accepted as sufficient finding under Jersey law

02

Material facts

Parties

Doraville Properties Corp.

Applicant

Attorney General

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Civil Asset Recovery / Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether a US default judgment finding assets as proceeds of crime satisfies the definition of 'tainted property' under Jersey law

Party arguments

Applicant
Applicant challenged whether the US default judgment constituted a sufficient finding for the purposes of Jersey's definition of 'tainted property'.
Respondent
Respondent argued that the US default judgment, based on verified evidence, expressly found the assets to be proceeds of crime and thus met the statutory requirements.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Civil Asset Recovery (International Co-operation) (Jersey) Law 2007, art. 1

    Definition of 'tainted property' requires a finding by an external decision-making body that property was used in, intended to be used in, or obtained from unlawful conduct.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

A US default judgment expressly finding on verified evidence that assets are proceeds of crime constitutes a finding for the purposes of the Jersey definition of 'tainted property'.

Court disposition

application dismissed

  • US default judgment accepted as sufficient finding under Jersey law

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[2017] 1 JLR 64

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> Doraville Properties Corp. v. Att. Gen. [2017] 1 JLR 64 (22 February 2017) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2017/JLR171064.html Cite as: [2017] 1 JLR 64 [ New search ] [ Help ] Doraville Properties Corp. v. Att. Gen. 2017 (1) JLR 64 (22 February 2017) Criminal Procedure-proceeds of criminal conduct-external civil asset recovery order-"tainted property"-definition of "tainted property" in Civil Asset Recovery (International Co-operation) (Jersey) Law 2007, art. 1 requires finding by external decision-making body that property (a) used in, or intended to be used in, unlawful conduct; or (b) obtained in course of, from proceeds of, or in connection with unlawful conduct-US default judgment, expressly finding on verified evidence that assets proceeds of crime, is finding for these purposes The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 2017 (1) JLR 64 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2017/JLR171064.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Civil Asset Recovery (International Co-operation) (Jersey) Law 2007, art. 1

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.