1998/30A - Stacho v Barclays Private Bank and Lord [1998] UR 30A (10 February 1998)
The plaintiff, as a discretionary beneficiary, is not entitled to disclosure of documents relating to trustees' deliberations, motives, or communications except for legal advice on the exercise of powers, unless bona fides are impugned in an action seeking wider remedies. Jersey courts are bound to follow English law principles governing the trust.
- Citation
- [1998] UR 30A
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Dorothy Anna-Maria Stacho (also known as Dorika Stacho); First Defendant: Barclays Private Bank and Trust Limited; Second Defendant: Clive Anthony Lord
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 10 February 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Strike Out / Ruling on Strike Out Application
- Outcome
- Application to strike out granted in part
- Legal Topics
- Disclosure of Trust Documents, Discretionary Trusts, Strike Out Applications
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dorothy Anna-Maria Stacho (also known as Dorika Stacho)
Plaintiff
Barclays Private Bank and Trust Limited
First Defendant
Clive Anthony Lord
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application to Strike Out / Ruling on Strike Out Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a beneficiary of a discretionary trust is entitled to disclosure of certain categories of documents from trustees
- 2 Whether allegations of mala fides entitle a beneficiary to wider discovery
- 3 Whether Jersey law provides a wider remedy than English law for disclosure of trust documents
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff, as a discretionary beneficiary, is not entitled to disclosure of documents relating to trustees' deliberations, motives, or communications except for legal advice on the exercise of powers, unless bona fides are impugned in an action seeking wider remedies. Jersey courts are bound to follow English law principles governing the trust.
Court Disposition
Application to strike out granted in part
Orders
- Striking out references in I(ii) to agendas
- Striking out sub-paragraph (a) of I(iii)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment