AG v Ward [2021] JRC 192 (24 June 2021)

AG v Ward [2021] JRC 192 (24 June 2021)

A substantial custodial sentence is warranted for grave and criminal assault on a police officer, especially where the offence is aggravated by commission while on bail, use of drugs, lack of remorse, and risk of serious harm.

Citation
[2021] JRC 192
Parties
Defendant: Douglas Ward; Prosecutor: Attorney General
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
24 June 2021
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Outcome
convicted and sentenced
Legal Topics
Assault, Public Order Offences, Resisting Arrest, Malicious Damage, Sentencing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Douglas Ward

Defendant

Attorney General

Prosecutor

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing

  1. 1 Appropriate sentence for grave and criminal assault on a police officer
  2. 2 Sentencing for offences committed while on bail
  3. 3 Assessment of aggravating and mitigating factors

Ratio Decidendi

A substantial custodial sentence is warranted for grave and criminal assault on a police officer, especially where the offence is aggravated by commission while on bail, use of drugs, lack of remorse, and risk of serious harm.

Court Disposition

convicted and sentenced

Orders

  • First Indictment: Count 1, 1 month's imprisonment; Count 2, 3 months' imprisonment, concurrent (total 3 months, to run consecutive to Second Indictment)
  • Second Indictment: Count 1, 2 years and 9 months' imprisonment; Counts 4 and 5, 3 months' imprisonment each, concurrent; Count 6, 6 months' imprisonment concurrent (total 2 years and 9 months)