Hilsenrath -v- AG [2005] JRC 096 (13 July 2005)
There is no right to disclosure of the letter of request or notices absent allegations of illegality, irrationality, or procedural impropriety; no compelling grounds for adjournment are made out.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2005] JRC 096
- Parties
- Applicant: Dr Oliver Hilsenrath; Respondent: Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 13 July 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Representation / Pre Trial Application
- Outcome
- applications refused
- Legal Topics
- Disclosure of Letter of Request, Judicial Review, Taking of Evidence, Confidentiality
Criminal Law International Cooperation Disclosure of Letter of Request Judicial Review Taking of Evidence Confidentiality
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Parties
Dr Oliver Hilsenrath
Applicant
Attorney General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Representation / Pre Trial Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Dr Hilsenrath is entitled to disclosure of the letter of request and notices issued by the Attorney General
- 2 Whether an adjournment should be granted for the taking of evidence
Ratio Decidendi
There is no right to disclosure of the letter of request or notices absent allegations of illegality, irrationality, or procedural impropriety; no compelling grounds for adjournment are made out.
Court Disposition
applications refused
Orders
- Dr Hilsenrath to pay Attorney General's costs on the standard basis
- leave to appeal refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment