AG -v- Tanguy [2015] JRC 036 (19 February 2015)

AG -v- Tanguy [2015] JRC 036 (19 February 2015)

The sentence was determined by considering the quantity of ecstasy tablets, the applicant's limited involvement, and significant mitigating factors, resulting in a reduced sentence from the starting point established by precedent.

Citation
[2015] JRC 036
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
19 February 2015
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Outcome
convicted and sentenced
Legal Topics
Drug Importation, Sentencing, Mitigation, Forfeiture
Criminal Law Drug Importation Sentencing Mitigation Forfeiture

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 appropriate sentence for importation of ecstasy tablets
  2. 2 mitigating factors in sentencing for drug offences

Ratio Decidendi

The sentence was determined by considering the quantity of ecstasy tablets, the applicant's limited involvement, and significant mitigating factors, resulting in a reduced sentence from the starting point established by precedent.

Court Disposition

convicted and sentenced

Orders

  • 5 years' imprisonment on Count 1
  • 1 week's imprisonment on Counts 2, 3, 5-7 (concurrent)