Duquemin v Reynolds [1987] JLR 259 (14 September 1987)
A surveyor preparing a report for a third party may owe a duty of care to a potential purchaser if it is reasonably foreseeable that the purchaser would rely on the report and could suffer loss from its negligence.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1987] JLR 259
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Duquemin; Defendant: Reynolds
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 14 September 1987
- Procedural Posture
- Tort Negligence / Judgment
- Outcome
- not specified
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Duty of Care, Professional Liability, Surveyors, Property Purchase
Tort Law Negligence Duty of Care Professional Liability Surveyors Property Purchase
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Duquemin
Plaintiff
Reynolds
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Tort Negligence / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a surveyor owes a duty of care to a potential purchaser when preparing a report for a third party (Housing Department)
- 2 Whether the purchaser was within the reasonable contemplation of the surveyor as a person likely to be affected by a negligent report
- 3 Whether reliance and causation of loss were established
Ratio Decidendi
A surveyor preparing a report for a third party may owe a duty of care to a potential purchaser if it is reasonably foreseeable that the purchaser would rely on the report and could suffer loss from its negligence.
Court Disposition
not specified
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment