Jersey Judgment

Durkin v Att. Gen. [2005] JLR 12 (11 January 2005)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

A trial is not necessarily unfair if the defence is made aware of incomplete disclosure and the undisclosed documents are insignificant, provided the Crown supplies a clear list of all undisclosed material.

Court disposition

trial not necessarily unfair

02

Material facts

Parties

Durkin

Applicant

Attorney General

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal / Trial

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The defence contended that incomplete disclosure by the Crown could render the trial unfair.
Respondent
The Crown argued that the trial is not necessarily unfair if the defence is made aware of incomplete disclosure and the undisclosed documents are insignificant.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Jersey Law Reports [2005] JLR 12

    The Crown must provide the defence with a clear list of all undisclosed material.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

A trial is not necessarily unfair if the defence is made aware of incomplete disclosure and the undisclosed documents are insignificant, provided the Crown supplies a clear list of all undisclosed material.

Court disposition

trial not necessarily unfair

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[2005] JLR 12

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> Durkin v Att. Gen. [2005] JLR 12 (11 January 2005) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2005/JLR050012.html Cite as: [2005] JLR 12 [ New search ] [ Help ] Durkin v Att. Gen. 2005 JLR 12 (11 January 2005) Criminal Procedure-prosecution case-disclosure of relevant information-Crown to provide defence with clear list of all undisclosed material-trial not necessarily otherwise unfair, if defence made aware of incomplete disclosure and undisclosed documents insignificant The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 2005 JLR 12 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2005/JLR050012.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.