AG -v- E and F [2015] JRC 134 (22 June 2015)
The court followed the approach in R-v-Hall and Others, imposing sentences based on current legislative provisions but limited to maximums at the time of offence, and determined that E's offending was so serious as to require a custodial sentence, while F's involvement and mitigation warranted non-custodial orders.
- Citation
- [2015] JRC 134
- Parties
- Defendant: E; Defendant: F; Prosecutor: Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 22 June 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- E sentenced to 4.5 years' imprisonment; F given 12-month probation order and 12-month binding over order; notification requirements imposed; forfeiture and destruction of photographs ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Sex Offences, Sentencing, Young Offenders, Notification Requirements, Probation Orders, Forfeiture
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
E
Defendant
F
Defendant
Attorney General
Prosecutor
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentencing for offences committed by young persons now adults
- 2 Application of notification requirements under Sex Offenders (Jersey) Law 2010
- 3 Custodial vs non-custodial sentences for young offenders
Ratio Decidendi
The court followed the approach in R-v-Hall and Others, imposing sentences based on current legislative provisions but limited to maximums at the time of offence, and determined that E's offending was so serious as to require a custodial sentence, while F's involvement and mitigation warranted non-custodial orders.
Court Disposition
E sentenced to 4.5 years' imprisonment; F given 12-month probation order and 12-month binding over order; notification requirements imposed; forfeiture and destruction of photographs ordered.
Orders
- E: Notification requirements for 6 years under Sex Offenders (Jersey) Law 2010
- E: 4.5 years' imprisonment (15 months for indecent assault, 2 years for gross indecency concurrent, 2 years 6 months for attempted incest consecutive)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment