IN the matter of T [2010] JRC 126 (07 July 2010)

IN the matter of T [2010] JRC 126 (07 July 2010)

Threshold criteria for intervention are met due to emotional neglect and the mother's conduct; the welfare of the children requires a residence order and supervision order in favour of E, with restricted contact for D and prohibited steps orders to protect the children.

Citation
[2010] JRC 126
Parties
Applicant: E; Respondent: D; Applicant: Minister; Guardian: Miss Ferguson
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
07 July 2010
Procedural Posture
Child Residence and Welfare / Final Judgment
Outcome
Residence order and supervision order granted in favour of E; prohibited steps orders made against D and E; application for telephone contact by D dismissed; passports to be released to E.
Legal Topics
Residence Order, Supervision Order, Parental Responsibility, Prohibited Steps Order, Contact Arrangements
Family Law Child Law Residence Order Supervision Order Parental Responsibility Prohibited Steps Order Contact Arrangements

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

E

Applicant

D

Respondent

Minister

Applicant

Miss Ferguson

Guardian

Procedural Posture

Child Residence and Welfare / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether threshold criteria for intervention are met under Children (Jersey) Law 2002
  2. 2 Whether a residence order and supervision order should be made in favour of E
  3. 3 Whether a prohibited steps order should be made against D and E

Ratio Decidendi

Threshold criteria for intervention are met due to emotional neglect and the mother's conduct; the welfare of the children requires a residence order and supervision order in favour of E, with restricted contact for D and prohibited steps orders to protect the children.

Court Disposition

Residence order and supervision order granted in favour of E; prohibited steps orders made against D and E; application for telephone contact by D dismissed; passports to be released to E.

Orders

  • Residence order in favour of E
  • Supervision order with Miss Sarah Jenner as supervisor