Jersey Judgment

E v H.&S.S. Min. [2012] 2 JLR 446 (30 November 2012)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The appeal was dismissed because the Royal Court had properly directed itself and there was sufficient evidence, including the uncorroborated evidence of the children and the psychologist's opinion, to find abuse on the balance of probabilities.

Court disposition

appeal dismissed

02

Material facts

Parties

E

Appellant

H.&S. S. Min.

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Appeal / Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether the Royal Court's finding that children were sexually abused by their father should be overturned on appeal

Party arguments

Applicant
The appellant challenged the Royal Court's finding that the children were sexually abused by their father.
Respondent
The respondent argued that the Royal Court properly directed itself and there was sufficient evidence to support the finding of abuse on the balance of probabilities.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    [2012] 2 JLR 446

    A finding of child sexual abuse by the Royal Court will not be overturned on appeal if the court properly directed itself and there was sufficient evidence, including uncorroborated evidence of the children and a psychologist's opinion as to authenticity, to find abuse on the balance of probabilities.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because the Royal Court had properly directed itself and there was sufficient evidence, including the uncorroborated evidence of the children and the psychologist's opinion, to find abuse on the balance of probabilities.

Court disposition

appeal dismissed

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[2012] 2 JLR 446

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> E v H.&S. S. Min. [2012] 2 JLR 446 (30 November 2012) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2012/JLR122446.html Cite as: [2012] 2 JLR 446 [ New search ] [ Help ] E v H.&S. S. Min. 2012 (2) JLR 446 (30 November 2012) Family Law-fact-finding hearings-assessment of evidence-child abuse-Royal Court's finding that children sexually abused by father not overturned on appeal if court properly directed itself and sufficient evidence (including children's uncorroborated evidence and psychologist's opinion that authentic) to find abuse on balance of probabilities The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 2012 (2) JLR 446 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2012/JLR122446.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

[2012] 2 JLR 446

Case cited

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.