Jersey Judgment

Eves v Crills [1998] JLR_Note 6c (10 February 1998)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court considered whether the applicant's claim fell within an exception to the rule in Foss v Harbottle, determining the applicability of the rule to the alleged infringement of minority shareholder rights.

Court disposition

not specified

02

Material facts

Parties

Eves

Applicant

Crills

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Civil / Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether the rule in Foss v Harbottle precludes a minority shareholder from bringing proceedings for infringement of rights

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant contends that their rights as a minority shareholder have been infringed and seeks relief despite the rule in Foss v Harbottle.
Respondent
The respondent relies on the rule in Foss v Harbottle to argue that the applicant, as a minority shareholder, cannot bring the proceedings.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Foss v Harbottle (1843) 2 Hare 461

    The rule in Foss v Harbottle prevents individual shareholders from bringing actions for wrongs done to the company, except in certain exceptions.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court considered whether the applicant's claim fell within an exception to the rule in Foss v Harbottle, determining the applicability of the rule to the alleged infringement of minority shareholder rights.

Court disposition

not specified

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

Judgment

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> Eves v Crills [1998] JLR_Note 6c (10 February 1998) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/1998/JLR98N006c.html Cite as: [1998] JLR_Note 6c [ New search ] [ Help ] Eves v Crills 1998 JLR Note 6c (10 February 1998) LEGAL PROCEEDINGS-rule in Foss v. Harbottle- infringing rights of minority shareholder The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 1998 JLR Note 6c BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/1998/JLR98N006c.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Foss v Harbottle (1843) 2 Hare 461

Case cited

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.