Eves v Hambros Bank (Jersey) limited and The Viscount [1996] JCA 054 (19 March 1996)

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [ DONATE ] Jersey Unreported Judgments You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Unreported Judgments >> Eves v Hambros Bank (Jersey) limited and The Viscount [1996] JCA 054 (19 March...

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [1996] JCA 054
Parties: Applicant: Eves; Respondent: Hambros Bank (Jersey) Limited; Respondent: The Viscount
Jurisdiction: Jersey
Judgment Date: 19 March 1996

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Party arguments 1

Parties

Eves

Applicant

Hambros Bank (Jersey) Limited

Respondent

The Viscount

Respondent

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.

Eves v Hambros Bank (Jersey) limited and The Viscount [1996] JCA 054 (19 March 1996)

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Parties

Judgment text and source record

Sign in to read the full judgment text