Eves v Hambros Bank (Jersey) Ltd. [2001] JLR 499 (02 August 2001)
Numerous applications by the same party are not necessarily vexatious if they are proportional to the dispute, such as efforts to save one's home and business.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2001] JLR 499
- Parties
- Applicant: Eves; Respondent: Hambros Bank (Jersey) Ltd.
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 02 August 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Application for Control of Vexatious Proceedings
- Outcome
- Application to enjoin proceedings as vexatious dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Vexatious Proceedings, Abuse of Process, Court's Power to Enjoin Proceedings
Civil Procedure Vexatious Proceedings Abuse of Process Court's Power to Enjoin Proceedings
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Eves
Applicant
Hambros Bank (Jersey) Ltd.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil / Application for Control of Vexatious Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 When may a court enjoin proceedings as an abuse of process for being vexatious?
Ratio Decidendi
Numerous applications by the same party are not necessarily vexatious if they are proportional to the dispute, such as efforts to save one's home and business.
Court Disposition
Application to enjoin proceedings as vexatious dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment