Eves v Hambros Bank (Jersey) Ltd. [2001] JLR 499 (02 August 2001)

Eves v Hambros Bank (Jersey) Ltd. [2001] JLR 499 (02 August 2001)

Numerous applications by the same party are not necessarily vexatious if they are proportional to the dispute, such as efforts to save one's home and business.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2001] JLR 499
Parties
Applicant: Eves; Respondent: Hambros Bank (Jersey) Ltd.
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
02 August 2001
Procedural Posture
Civil / Application for Control of Vexatious Proceedings
Outcome
Application to enjoin proceedings as vexatious dismissed.
Legal Topics
Vexatious Proceedings, Abuse of Process, Court's Power to Enjoin Proceedings
Civil Procedure Vexatious Proceedings Abuse of Process Court's Power to Enjoin Proceedings

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Eves

Applicant

Hambros Bank (Jersey) Ltd.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil / Application for Control of Vexatious Proceedings

  1. 1 When may a court enjoin proceedings as an abuse of process for being vexatious?

Ratio Decidendi

Numerous applications by the same party are not necessarily vexatious if they are proportional to the dispute, such as efforts to save one's home and business.

Court Disposition

Application to enjoin proceedings as vexatious dismissed.