Eves v Le Main [1999] JLR 44 (22 January 1999)
It is not a denial of justice nor a breach of Article 6(1) ECHR to hear a defendant's strike-out application in the absence of the plaintiff if the plaintiff was properly notified of the hearing; the court retains discretion not to hold the hearing, for example, if the plaintiff is genuinely absent from the Island and likely to appeal.
- Citation
- [1999] JLR 44
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Eves; Defendant: Le Main
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 22 January 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Application to Strike Out; Hearing in Absence of Plaintiff
- Outcome
- application to strike out may be heard in absence of plaintiff if properly notified; no breach of ECHR art. 6(1)
- Legal Topics
- Appearance, Non Appearance of Party, Strike Out Application, Right to Fair Hearing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Eves
Plaintiff
Le Main
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Application to Strike Out; Hearing in Absence of Plaintiff
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether it is a denial of justice to hear a defendant's strike-out application in the absence of the plaintiff if the plaintiff was properly notified of the hearing
- 2 Whether such a hearing breaches Article 6(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights
Ratio Decidendi
It is not a denial of justice nor a breach of Article 6(1) ECHR to hear a defendant's strike-out application in the absence of the plaintiff if the plaintiff was properly notified of the hearing; the court retains discretion not to hold the hearing, for example, if the plaintiff is genuinely absent from the Island and likely to appeal.
Court Disposition
application to strike out may be heard in absence of plaintiff if properly notified; no breach of ECHR art. 6(1)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment