In re F (Care Proceedings) v [2013] 2 JLR 154 (28 June 2013)
The court held that the siblings' Article 8 rights were outweighed by the Article 8 rights of the applicant, child, and mother, as well as the Article 6 right to a fair trial. Disclosure was necessary to protect the child from harm and to ensure the welfare of all family members.
- Citation
- [2013] 2 JLR 154
- Parties
- Applicant: F (Father); Subject: Child; Interested Parties: Siblings; Interested Party: Mother
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 28 June 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Care Proceedings / Application for Disclosure of Documents
- Outcome
- Application for disclosure granted with restrictions.
- Legal Topics
- Children, Confidentiality of Documents, Disclosure, Contact Applications, Psychological Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
F (Father)
Applicant
Child
Subject
Siblings
Interested Parties
Mother
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Care Proceedings / Application for Disclosure of Documents
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether psychological assessment of father's family from previous care proceedings can be disclosed in current contact application despite siblings' opposition
- 2 Balancing ECHR Article 8 rights to privacy against Article 6 right to fair trial and welfare of the child
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the siblings' Article 8 rights were outweighed by the Article 8 rights of the applicant, child, and mother, as well as the Article 6 right to a fair trial. Disclosure was necessary to protect the child from harm and to ensure the welfare of all family members.
Court Disposition
Application for disclosure granted with restrictions.
Orders
- Psychological assessment to be disclosed to a limited class of persons.
- No public use of the disclosed documents.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment