T v T [2001] JRC 181 (10 August 2001)
The representation to overturn the consent order is dismissed because there are no sufficiently strong reasons to disturb an agreement made recently with the benefit of legal advice.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2001] JRC 181
- Parties
- Respondent: Mother; Applicant: Father
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 10 August 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Child Welfare / Post Consent Order Representation
- Outcome
- representation dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Child Welfare, Consent Orders, Jurisdiction
Family Law Child Welfare Consent Orders Jurisdiction
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Parties
Mother
Respondent
Father
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Family Law Child Welfare / Post Consent Order Representation
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to overturn a recent consent order regarding child welfare
- 2 Appropriateness of the timing of the next hearing
Ratio Decidendi
The representation to overturn the consent order is dismissed because there are no sufficiently strong reasons to disturb an agreement made recently with the benefit of legal advice.
Court Disposition
representation dismissed
Orders
- Children must leave the jurisdiction with their mother later today.
- Social Services in Jersey and the UK are requested to seek an earlier hearing date in England.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment