In the matter of FF (Child access) [2012] JRC 150 (14 August 2012)

In the matter of FF (Child access) [2012] JRC 150 (14 August 2012)

The father's lack of commitment, absence from proceedings, history of violence, and failure to demonstrate concern for the child's welfare justified refusal of parental responsibility and direct contact. The welfare of the child, including developmental needs and risk of harm, required confirmation of residence with the mother and restriction of further applications by the father without leave of the court.

Citation
[2012] JRC 150
Parties
Applicant: Father; Respondent: Mother
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
14 August 2012
Procedural Posture
Family Law Child Contact and Parental Responsibility / Final Judgment
Outcome
Father's application for contact and parental responsibility dismissed; mother's application for residence order and restriction of contact granted.
Legal Topics
Parental Responsibility, Child Contact, Residence Order, Domestic Violence, Non Molestation Injunction, Costs
Family Law Child Law Parental Responsibility Child Contact Residence Order Domestic Violence Non Molestation Injunction Costs

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Father

Applicant

Mother

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Family Law Child Contact and Parental Responsibility / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Should the father be granted parental responsibility for the child?
  2. 2 Should the father be granted direct or indirect contact with the child?
  3. 3 Should the residence order in favour of the mother be confirmed?

Ratio Decidendi

The father's lack of commitment, absence from proceedings, history of violence, and failure to demonstrate concern for the child's welfare justified refusal of parental responsibility and direct contact. The welfare of the child, including developmental needs and risk of harm, required confirmation of residence with the mother and restriction of further applications by the father without leave of the court.

Court Disposition

Father's application for contact and parental responsibility dismissed; mother's application for residence order and restriction of contact granted.

Orders

  • Residence order in favour of the mother confirmed.
  • No direct contact between father and child; age-appropriate indirect contact via Jersey Family Court Advisory Service permitted.