Ferguson v Planning Min. [2013] 1 JLR_Note 9 (28 January 2013)
The court held that the procedure adopted by the Planning Minister must be fair, and any departure from fairness may render the decision invalid.
- Parties
- Applicant: Ferguson; Respondent: Planning Minister
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 28 January 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment
- Outcome
- judgment delivered
- Legal Topics
- Procedural Fairness, Decision Making Process
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Ferguson
Applicant
Planning Minister
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the procedure adopted by the Planning Minister in making the planning decision was fair
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the procedure adopted by the Planning Minister must be fair, and any departure from fairness may render the decision invalid.
Court Disposition
judgment delivered
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment