AG v Grandmougin and Ferrantin [2002] JRC 81 (19 April 2002)
The accused breached regulations by catching undersized spider crabs and exceeding by-catch limits. However, due to lack of awareness of recent legislative changes and cooperation, fines were imposed at a reduced level for the by-catch charge, but the court emphasized that future breaches would attract higher penalties.
- Citation
- [2002] JRC 81
- Parties
- Accused/master: Mr Grandmougin; Accused/owner: Mr Ferrantim
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 19 April 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- conviction and fines imposed
- Legal Topics
- Fishing Regulations, By Catch Limits, Undersized Catch, Sentencing, EU Law Compliance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Grandmougin
Accused/master
Mr Ferrantim
Accused/owner
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused breached regulations by catching undersized spider crabs
- 2 Whether the accused breached by-catch limits for scallop dredging
- 3 Appropriate level of fines for breaches of fishing conservation regulations
Ratio Decidendi
The accused breached regulations by catching undersized spider crabs and exceeding by-catch limits. However, due to lack of awareness of recent legislative changes and cooperation, fines were imposed at a reduced level for the by-catch charge, but the court emphasized that future breaches would attract higher penalties.
Court Disposition
conviction and fines imposed
Orders
- Mr Grandmougin fined £1,000 or 2 months' imprisonment in default on count 1
- Mr Grandmougin fined £250 or 2 weeks' imprisonment in default on count 2, consecutive
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment