Africa Edge v Incat and Others [2008] JCA 205 (27 November 2008)

Africa Edge v Incat and Others [2008] JCA 205 (27 November 2008)

The Deputy Bailiff correctly applied principles of private international law and discretionary relief, treating the Belgian judgment as final and conclusive for enforcement in Jersey. The orders for worldwide asset disclosure and widened injunctions were reasonable and proportionate given the circumstances, including inadequate prior disclosures and the nature of the proceedings.

Citation
[2008] JCA 205
Parties
Appellant/plaintiff: Africa Edge S.a.r.l.; First Respondent/first Defendant: Incat Equipment Rental Limited; Second Respondent/second Defendant: John Keith Haden; Party Cited: Luba Freeport Limited
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
27 November 2008
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal Against Royal Court Order Dated 10 October 2008
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Freezing Injunctions, Asset Disclosure, Enforcement of Foreign Judgments, Trusts, Discretionary Orders
Civil Procedure Private International Law Freezing Injunctions Asset Disclosure Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Trusts Discretionary Orders

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Africa Edge S.a.r.l.

Appellant/plaintiff

Incat Equipment Rental Limited

First Respondent/first Defendant

John Keith Haden

Second Respondent/second Defendant

Luba Freeport Limited

Party Cited

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Appeal Against Royal Court Order Dated 10 October 2008

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Royal Court erred in granting worldwide asset disclosure and widening injunctions based on a foreign judgment
  2. 2 Whether the Belgian judgment was final and conclusive for enforcement purposes in Jersey
  3. 3 Whether the Deputy Bailiff misapplied principles regarding post-judgment orders

Ratio Decidendi

The Deputy Bailiff correctly applied principles of private international law and discretionary relief, treating the Belgian judgment as final and conclusive for enforcement in Jersey. The orders for worldwide asset disclosure and widened injunctions were reasonable and proportionate given the circumstances, including inadequate prior disclosures and the nature of the proceedings.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is refused.
  • The Royal Court's order for worldwide asset disclosure and widened injunctions stands.