Representation of FRM Holdings Limited [2012] JRC 120 (18 June 2012)
The rights of Non Loanholder Scheme Shareholders and Loanholder Scheme Shareholders under the proposed scheme are so dissimilar that they cannot consult together with a view to a common interest; therefore, separate meetings must be convened for each class.
- Citation
- [2012] JRC 120
- Parties
- Applicant: FRM Holdings Limited; Purchaser: RBH Holdings (Jersey) Limited; Shareholder/respondent: Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Bank Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 18 June 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Scheme of Arrangement Under Article 125 of the Companies (jersey) Law 1991 / Application for Order Convening Class Meetings
- Outcome
- Order granted
- Legal Topics
- Schemes of Arrangement, Class Meetings, Shareholder Rights, Acquisition of Shares
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
FRM Holdings Limited
Applicant
RBH Holdings (Jersey) Limited
Purchaser
Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Bank Limited
Shareholder/respondent
Procedural Posture
Scheme of Arrangement Under Article 125 of the Companies (jersey) Law 1991 / Application for Order Convening Class Meetings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether separate class meetings should be convened for different groups of shareholders under a scheme of arrangement
- 2 How to determine class composition based on similarity or dissimilarity of rights under the scheme
Ratio Decidendi
The rights of Non Loanholder Scheme Shareholders and Loanholder Scheme Shareholders under the proposed scheme are so dissimilar that they cannot consult together with a view to a common interest; therefore, separate meetings must be convened for each class.
Court Disposition
Order granted
Orders
- Meeting of Loanholder Scheme Shareholders to be convened
- Separate meeting of Non Loanholder Scheme Shareholders to be convened
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment