Galante v Att. Gen. [1997] JLR_Note 14b (08 April 1997)
The court held that clarity in sentencing judgments is essential and must be maintained to uphold the integrity of the judicial process.
- Parties
- Applicant: Galante; Respondent: Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 08 April 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- judgment on clarity of sentence
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Clarity of Judgment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Galante
Applicant
Attorney General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court's judgment in sentencing was sufficiently clear
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that clarity in sentencing judgments is essential and must be maintained to uphold the integrity of the judicial process.
Court Disposition
judgment on clarity of sentence
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment