Gamlestaden v Baltic Partners [2005] JCA 015 (10 February 2005)

Gamlestaden v Baltic Partners [2005] JCA 015 (10 February 2005)

Where a company is insolvent and any relief would only benefit the applicant as a creditor, not as a shareholder, there is no jurisdiction under Article 141 of the Companies (Jersey) Law 1991 to grant relief. The facts pleaded disclosed no reasonable cause of action because no relief could protect the applicant's interests as a shareholder.

Citation
[2005] JCA 015
Parties
Appellant: Gamlestaden Fastigheter AB; First Respondent: Baltic Partners, Ltd.; Second Respondent: David Paul Boléat; Third Respondent: Michael David de Figueiredo; Fourth Respondent: Peter Arthur Neil Bailey
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
10 February 2005
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Royal Court Judgment Striking Out Re Amended Representation
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; judgment of the Royal Court affirmed.
Legal Topics
Unfair Prejudice, Shareholder Remedies, Directors' Fiduciary Duties, Derivative Actions, Strike Out Applications, Jurisdiction Under Companies (jersey) Law 1991
Company Law Insolvency Law Unfair Prejudice Shareholder Remedies Directors' Fiduciary Duties Derivative Actions Strike Out Applications Jurisdiction Under Companies (jersey) Law 1991

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gamlestaden Fastigheter AB

Appellant

Baltic Partners, Ltd.

First Respondent

David Paul Boléat

Second Respondent

Michael David de Figueiredo

Third Respondent

Peter Arthur Neil Bailey

Fourth Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Royal Court Judgment Striking Out Re Amended Representation

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a shareholder can obtain relief under Article 141 of the Companies (Jersey) Law 1991 when the company is insolvent and no benefit can accrue to the shareholder qua shareholder
  2. 2 Whether the conduct complained of was unfairly prejudicial to the interests of the shareholder as a member
  3. 3 Whether the relief sought would protect the interests of the applicant as a shareholder or merely as a creditor

Ratio Decidendi

Where a company is insolvent and any relief would only benefit the applicant as a creditor, not as a shareholder, there is no jurisdiction under Article 141 of the Companies (Jersey) Law 1991 to grant relief. The facts pleaded disclosed no reasonable cause of action because no relief could protect the applicant's interests as a shareholder.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; judgment of the Royal Court affirmed.

Orders

  • Re-amended representation struck out for disclosing no reasonable cause of action.
  • No relief granted under Article 141 of the Companies (Jersey) Law 1991.