AG -v- Hume and Ors 8-May-2006 [2006] JRC 076 (08 May 2006)

AG -v- Hume and Ors 8-May-2006 [2006] JRC 076 (08 May 2006)

Sentences imposed reflect the seriousness and quantity of drugs, the role of each defendant, and mitigation for guilty pleas, cooperation, and youth, adjusted by the totality principle to avoid excessive aggregate sentences.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2006] JRC 076
Parties
Defendant: Gareth Hume; Defendant: Roberts; Defendant: Brookes; Defendant: Blampied; Defendant: Ian Manson; Defendant: Traylen
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
08 May 2006
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Outcome
convicted and sentenced
Legal Topics
Drug Offences, Sentencing, Conspiracy, Mitigation, Totality Principle
Criminal Law Drug Offences Sentencing Conspiracy Mitigation Totality Principle

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gareth Hume

Defendant

Roberts

Defendant

Brookes

Defendant

Blampied

Defendant

Ian Manson

Defendant

Traylen

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 appropriate sentencing for drug offences
  2. 2 application of totality principle
  3. 3 mitigation for guilty pleas and cooperation

Ratio Decidendi

Sentences imposed reflect the seriousness and quantity of drugs, the role of each defendant, and mitigation for guilty pleas, cooperation, and youth, adjusted by the totality principle to avoid excessive aggregate sentences.

Court Disposition

convicted and sentenced

Orders

  • Gareth Hume: 15 years' imprisonment
  • Roberts: 9 years' imprisonment