Gheewala v Compendium Trust Co. Ltd. [1999] JLR 154 (14 July 1999)
The court held that the defendant bears the burden of proving that another forum is clearly more appropriate, but even if this is established, the court retains discretion to refuse a stay if justice so requires.
- Citation
- [1999] JLR 154
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Gheewala; Defendant: Compendium Trust Co. Ltd.
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 14 July 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory
- Outcome
- stay refused
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction, Forum Conveniens, Stay of Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Parties
Gheewala
Plaintiff
Compendium Trust Co. Ltd.
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Jersey is the appropriate forum for the dispute
- 2 Whether the defendant has established that another forum is clearly more appropriate than Jersey
- 3 Whether justice requires that the Jersey proceedings should not be stayed
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the defendant bears the burden of proving that another forum is clearly more appropriate, but even if this is established, the court retains discretion to refuse a stay if justice so requires.
Court Disposition
stay refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment