Jersey Judgment

Glazebrook v Housing Cttee. [2000] JLR 301 (14 September 2000)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

It is generally wrong to decide questions of fact in civil proceedings before they are resolved in related criminal proceedings, but interlocutory stages may proceed to avoid delay, provided no prejudice to the criminal trial.

Court disposition

Partial stay granted

Orders

  • Civil proceedings stayed except for interlocutory stages not impinging on facts at issue in criminal proceedings

02

Material facts

Parties

Glazebrook

Applicant

Housing Committee

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Civil / Interlocutory

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Civil proceedings should be stayed to avoid prejudice to the fair trial of related criminal proceedings.
Respondent
Civil proceedings may proceed at least to interlocutory stages to avoid unnecessary delay, provided no prejudice to criminal trial.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Jersey law

    Le criminel tient le civil en etat: criminal proceedings take precedence over civil proceedings where facts overlap.

  2. 02

    Jersey law

    Court has discretion to control civil proceedings to ensure no prejudice to fair trial of criminal proceedings.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

It is generally wrong to decide questions of fact in civil proceedings before they are resolved in related criminal proceedings, but interlocutory stages may proceed to avoid delay, provided no prejudice to the criminal trial.

Obiter and limits

  • Civil action may be tried to the extent that the decision will not impinge on facts in criminal proceedings.

Court disposition

Partial stay granted

  • Civil proceedings stayed except for interlocutory stages not impinging on facts at issue in criminal proceedings

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[2000] JLR 301

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> Glazebrook v Housing Cttee. [2000] JLR 301 (14 September 2000) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2000/JLR000301.html Cite as: [2000] JLR 301 [ New search ] [ Help ] Glazebrook v Housing Cttee. 2000 JLR 301 (14 September 2000) Civil Procedure - parallel civil and criminal proceedings - le criminel tient le civil en etat - discretion to control civil proceedings to ensure no prejudice to fair trial of criminal proceedings-burden on person seeking exercise of discretion-deciding questions of fact before resolved in criminal proceedings generally wrong, although may proceed with interlocutory stages to avoid delay-may try civil action to extent that decision will not impinge on facts in criminal proceedings The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 2000 JLR 301 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2000/JLR000301.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.